Characters With No Redeeming Qualities
In real life, even off-putting people have some skill, some ability, or some positive quality. That’s also true in crime fiction. If a character has no positive qualities at all – nothing that makes him or her worth reading about – then readers won’t want to turn pages. You could say it’s part of making sure that characters are well-rounded and multi-dimensional, or you could say it’s part of making characters authentic. Either way, the best characters have at least something positive about them.
For instance, in Thomas Harris’ The Silence of the Lambs, we meet Dr. Hannibal Lecter. He’s a resident of the Baltimore State Hospital for the Criminally Insane. He’s a vicious killer who is quite candid about some of the brutal crimes he’s committed. To put it succinctly, he’s confined to this hospital for very, very good reasons. He is not a nice person. And yet, he is a most compelling character. He has redeeming qualities. For instance, he is absolutely brilliant. For many people, that’s a fine quality. He’s also well-spoken, a connoisseur of good food and wine, and he’s interesting. He is also very honest, and most people find that refreshing. Certainly he’s a complex person, as FBI trainee Clarice Starling discovers when she is assigned to get his help on a serial-killer case the FBI is working. As Starling and Lecter interact, match wits and slowly come to understand each other, we learn that Lecter is much more than just a deranged killer.
And then there’s Daniel Silva’s Gabriel Allon. He’s a killer, too. In fact, he’s a paid assassin who’s frequently employed by a shadowy Israeli Intelligence group called The Office. But he has redeeming qualities, too. He is a brilliant art restorer with a deep knowledge of the art world. He’s also a team leader with strong organizational skills. And, odd as it may seem, he has a code of ethics. Does he kill people? Yes. Does he have redeeming qualities? Also yes.
Agatha Christie’s Hercule Poirot certainly isn’t everyone’s cuppa. He’s finicky, conceited, and arrogant. He likes “running the show,” and even he admits he likes to boast about his ability to solve crime. And yet, he’s got millions of fans. Why? He’s brilliant. He can be very compassionate. He’s got a lot of knowledge, too, and he’s egalitarian: he’ll admit to being a bit of a snob, but he is no respecter of class and wealth when it comes to catching criminals.
Characters Who Aren’t Authentic
One important appeal of crime fiction is that it reflects real life. We get involved with fictional characters because they could be us. They act and speak like we do and have believable reactions to life. If characters are not authentic – if the reader can’t imagine a real person speaking or behaving the way the character does, this is often enough to make the reader stop caring.
Andrea Camilleri’s Salvo Montalbano has won a lot of fans in part because he is authentic. When things go well, he’s proud and happy as anyone would be. When they go badly he gets upset, curses and yells as lots of real life people do. He’s got romantic ups and downs, so to speak, the way real people do. When he solves cases, it’s not because of superhuman powers; instead, he uses his experience, his intelligence and help from his team-mates, just as real detectives do.
You could say that’s also true of Liza Marklund’s Annika Bengtzon. She’s popular because she is an authentic person who reacts to life as real people do. She feels the same conflicts between job and home that many people with full-time jobs and children have. She’s not always right. She’s not even always pleasant to be around. But she is real.
So are Deborah Crombie’s Duncan Kincaid and Gemma James. They react in very authentic ways to life. For instance, at one point in the series, James suffers a sad personal loss. Her reaction to it is believable and authentic. James and Kincaid often have to face the conflicts between their jobs and their desire for a stable home life, and they react to those conflicts in believable ways.
Martin Edwards’ Hannah Scarlett and Daniel Kind are authentic characters, too. For instance, in The Cipher Garden, DCI Scarlett and her Cold Case Review team investigate the ten-year-old murder of landscaper Warren Howe. As they look into the case, some shocking, dark secrets are revealed. One of those secrets results in a tragic event; when that event happens, Scarlett’s reaction is as human as a reader could want.
Characters Who are “Flat” or Stereotyped
A well-written crime fiction novel is focused on the plot. But at the same time, character development also matters. Characters who are too “flat” – whom we don’t learn anything about – can leave the reader with no interest. They’re almost like the connect-the-dots picture you see. Characters who are sketched in as stereotypes, with no interesting qualities, also put readers off. This doesn’t mean that every single character in a novel must be given a complete backstory. It does mean, though, that in well-written crime fiction, the characters have some personality that goes beyond mere outlines.
For instance, Ann Cleeves’ Vera Stanhope is far from stereotypical. She’s got personal demons like a lot of crime fiction sleuths, but she isn’t obsessed with them. She enjoys her pint, but she’s not a stereotypical alcoholic “loner” detective.
Colin Cotterill’s Dr. Siri Paiboun is also far from a “flat” character. He’s got several dimensions to his personality including humour, spirituality and a fascinating history. He’s interesting, intelligent and has depths that “flat” or stereotyped characters simply don’t have.
Of course, creating a character who’s not “flat” is easier in a series than in a standalone novel. However, there are also plenty of standalone characters with several dimensions to their personalities. For instance, Martin Clark’s The Legal Limit is a standalone that features brothers Mason and Gates Hunt, who grow up in rural Patrick County, Virginia. They’re raised in an abusive and dysfunctional home, but they react to it quite differently. Mason takes advantage of all of the opportunities he gets, earns a scholarship to law school and becomes the commonwealth’s attorney for Patrick County. Gates, who’s got superb athletic talent, squanders his opportunities and ends up living on his girlfriend’s Welfare payments, money he gets from his mother, and the occasional drug deal. One night, the Hunt brothers encounter Wayne Thompson, Gates’ rival for his girlfriend. Thompson and Gates Hunt get into an argument and before either really knows what’s happened, Gates has shot Thomspon. Mason helps his brother cover up the crime and life goes on for both men. Then, Gates Hunt is convicted for cocaine trafficking and begs his brother to help get him out of prison. When Mason refuses, Gates threatens to tell police that Mason killed Wayne Thompson. When he follows through on his threat, Mason Hunt is up against a murder indictment. The characters in this standalone are all rounded characters with more than one dimension to them. Even Gates Hunt, who’s portrayed as the antagonist, isn’t “all bad,” or really stereotypical. Mason isn’t portrayed as all good, either, and we see several dimensions of both men.
I’ve only had space to mention a few things that can make characters off-putting enough for the reader to lose interest. What about you? Are there any traits in characters that make you stop caring?
*NOTE: The title of this post is a line from Eric Clapton’s Promises.